Author: The NubianJobs Team

  • The Importance of Fulfilling, Purposeful Work: Finding Joy Beyond Just Employment

    The Importance of Fulfilling, Purposeful Work: Finding Joy Beyond Just Employment

    Since the advent of man on planet earth, he has been working. And up to today, work is seen as a necessity to survive in the world. Indeed, without adequate employment how could one provide for himself and his dependents? Obviously, then, we all need good employment and its good monetary reward to function properly in society. Some claim that “Money is the root of all evil” by misquoting what today appears in 1Timothy 6:10 in the Holy Scriptures. Yet, that text warns against, not money, but “the love of money”. Elsewhere in the Scriptures, King Solomon, himself the richest man in the world then, wrote that “money is a defence” or a protection. (Ecclesiastes 7:12, KJV) So it is good to work and earn good money to provide necessities, enjoyment and even some luxuries.

    Satisfying work
    However, how do you make your employees view their work? As a source of joy or a source of heartache and even sickness? We have every reason to believe that work is supposed to be satisfying and fulfilling. It has to be enjoyable. Why so? That is because it aligns with human needs for purpose, autonomy, and connection. Enjoyable work allows individuals to feel motivated and engaged, increasing productivity and creativity as people are more willing to invest energy and ideas when tasks are interesting and enjoyable. Satisfaction in work arises when tasks match personal strengths and provide a sense of accomplishment, fostering pride in one’s contributions and bolstering mental well-being. Fulfillment in the workplace occurs when individuals feel their work makes a meaningful impact, resonates with personal values, and offers growth opportunities. Collectively, these qualities create a positive feedback loop that benefits both individuals and organizations, leading to a more resilient, committed, and innovative workforce.


    No wonder the average person loves to work. How would your life be without work? Would you enjoy waking up in the morning without any plan of working and rather just eat, listen to music or watch movies and sleep again before the evening? Maybe, even your last leave was so boring to you. Suddenly the time that used to fly at the office had now become stagnant! Work is good. Besides, it is great to, not just work, but be busy, be occupied at work. Maybe you would identify with my experience to illustrate why:

    I did my national service with a government department. You can imagine my enthusiasm waking up every morning and proudly dressing up for work in a shirt and a tie only to get to work and do next-to-nothing. My assignment for the whole day was to go through the news papers and clip articles that related to my department. Another was for my boss to send me to either buy him cola nuts or ‘Kofi brokeman’ (roasted plantain and groundnut). You have no idea how guilty I felt whenever I was returning home and would greet neighbors and family and they would say “Ayekoo”! (in Ghana, “Ayekoo” is an expression used to congratulate someone for their effort or success. It translates roughly to “well done” or “good job” and is often said to acknowledge a job well done, particularly in situations that require hard work or dedication. It’s a gesture of respect and encouragement, showing appreciation for the person’s effort or achievement. The recipient would then respond “Yaaye,” in acceptance). Could I say “yaaye” when I knew that I did not do any job? And mind you, sitting idle and chatting with fellow service personnel and other workers the whole day–and some times dosing off–was more stressful than a busy schedule! I always came home exhausted, ironically.

    Rewarding work is therefore a blessing, not a curse. And a reasonable busy work schedule is very satisfying. At least there is some joy and pride that come with accomplishment. Such feelings are unknown to the lazy person who deprives himself of hard work.

    It is therefore very imperative that in designing tasks for the workplace, management takes into consideration the environment, processes, procedures and resources–beyond a beautifully designed and air-conditioned office– that must be made available to make work both challenging and yet pleasurable.

    The reality
    The importance of work and the satisfaction derived therefrom notwithstanding, the work of a lot of people is viewed by them simply as nothing less than a curse. There are so many career people who are so stressed-out that they are not able to even enjoy the sunrise and sunset in the morning and evening respectively. And even when they see them, there is so much on their mind that they hardly take note. Many also earn the money they have always dreamed of but never have enough time to enjoy it.

    However, this stress from work is not only limited to a busy schedule. Sometimes it has to do with what one endures before he gets to work, while working and when returning from work such as the traffic jam or having to wake up at 4.00am or earlier without enough sleep. This has given birth to ‘dashboard dining’—eating and driving at the same time. Just last two weeks I saw a certain career lady having her launch in a traffic jam!

    What can management do to lighten the load on employees? How can they make work more pleasurable and fun—in fact make the workplace inspiring and humane—i.e. promoting creativity and innovation while reducing stress? Before answering these questions, let us address a few more reasons why the work of majority of people has become a constant source of stress.

    Work–a constant source of stress
    The first I identify is work that is discrete and repetitive in nature. One of my friends said that working with a certain enviable and dominant service provider in the services sector in Ghana makes one dumb. Why so? He said the institutions that provide that type of service do not encourage initiative. Work is made up of simply following procedures handed down by an ‘all-knowing’ Board. Hence to him, a smart person would not work for more than five (5) years with such institutions. Such types of work easily bore and depress persons who love to take initiatives in innovative and creative ways.

    Competition for promotion is yet another source of dissatisfaction. In an environment where everyone is competing to outwit the other for a promotion and/or a raise, such strife only adds unnecessary pressure that can impact negatively on job satisfaction and meaningful relationships. Competitive people are never content with their lot in life—a major source of depression.

    Next is the effect of deadly work schedules on familial and social relationships. One with an excessively busy schedule hardly has enough quality time to spend with family and friends. Spouses only talk about necessary things on phone while at work. And when at home, both are so tired they are eager to go to bed early to prepare for the next day. Children hardly get to sit at the dinner table with parents to share the day’s experiences. And the week-ends do not help either, with sometimes more work or funerals and weddings to attend. This often leads to weak relationships between spouses and between parents and their children, thus adding more stress.

    Further, excessively busy work schedules cause health problems. Chronic stress may lead to a break-down of the immune system, opening the way for related health problems.

    In view of all the foregoing, what can management do to make work more enjoyable; make the workplace more inspiring, humane and human?

    A Paradigm Shift
    I do not intend to waste our time on large organisations. These normally respond very slowly to change and are very satisfied with the status-quo. Our focus will be on modern adventurous and revolutionary-thinking micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSME’s) who wish to make their management styles and practices come more in tune with the realities of today; those who really want to make their workplaces inspiring places to work. While at it, let us close our school text-books for the time being and assume we know nothing.

    Are you ready for the paradigm shift? What paradigm shift are we talking about? It is this—virtualization. With globalization comes virtualization. Due to improved telecommunications and transportation systems, we have for several years now been talking about globalization—the worldwide interdependence of people and countries. Globalization has made it possible to know by the second events going on around the globe. Globalization has also made the effects of an event at one part of the world affect the other parts, as was demonstrated by the global financial melt-down in the late 2000s and the spread of diseases such as the recent global covid-19 pandemic.

    In 2012 I stated the following in my column The Business Strategy Analyst in the Business & Financial Times, Ghana: “To the extent that we have been globalised, is it not time we also worked from anywhere in the world irrespective of national and language barriers–virtualization? Certainly! And that is what Web 2.0 has made possible, coming to the rescue, as it were. The time is fast-approaching when all of those huge office complexes we see in our cities and big towns, such as those in what has come to be called the ‘banking enclave’ in Accra will be turned into hotels and apartment buildings. The shopping malls and banking halls will also become warehouses for online supermarkets and malls. Those who prepare now will reap the most dividends. Those who nostalgically hold on to the past, as it is in the case of large organizations, will simply evaporate. Hence, as an MSME this is the time your management style and thinking changed to accommodate the new wind that is blowing across the globe.”

    The COVID-19 pandemic forced corporations worldwide to adopt modern technology rapidly, enabling employees to work remotely. Statistics show that by April 2020, around 88% of companies globally had mandated or encouraged remote work, according to Gartner. Tools like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack became essential for communication and collaboration, leading to an upsurge in demand for cloud-based services; Microsoft reported a 775% increase in cloud service usage in affected areas. This shift impacted commercial real estate significantly, as large corporations reduced their office space requirements, causing a notable decline in demand for office leases. In the U.S., for instance, office vacancy rates rose sharply, reaching nearly 18% by early 2021, per CBRE data. This situation not only underscored the flexibility and resilience of remote work technology but also highlighted a more efficient, adaptable workforce model.

    Despite the successful adaptation to remote work technology, many large corporations are now returning to traditional office models, pulling employees back to physical locations. Data from a 2022 Gallup poll reveals that nearly half of all remote-capable jobs are now hybrid or fully on-site again, as companies revert to pre-pandemic practices. This reluctance to fully embrace modernized work structures may stem from corporate cultural inertia or perceived challenges in managing a dispersed workforce.

    Small businesses, however, should take a different approach, leveraging remote work technology to save costs on real estate, access a broader talent pool, and improve employee satisfaction. By adopting a modern, flexible work model, small businesses can set a competitive example and avoid the overhead and rigidity that may increasingly disadvantage large corporations in a tech-forward world.

    In your business plan, what IT technology have you planned to employ in executing your business processes and operations? What IT technology do you intend to deploy for management processes? What is your human resource plan like? If IT technology is missing, and if your human resource plan is like what pertains in today’s large organizations, then this is my humble advice: Go chuck it into the next fire you see! If you do not do that, your business will suffer that fate soon—chucked into the fire. Do I sound apocalyptic? Well, that is the reality with Web 3.0 in the offing. Due in part to the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), Web 3.0 is anticipated to surpass Web 2.0 by being more open, decentralized, and ultimately more useful.

    Thus instead of investing monies in rent and what Ghanaian landlords call ‘goodwill’, why not employ IT technology that permits you and your employees to work virtually? This may seem simplistic but it is here to stay. In fact many companies in the world are already operating virtually. Granted, this may pose certain issues regarding supervision and job performance. But those can be surmounted.

    Let us look at supervision. To begin with, who deceives you into believing that you can adequately supervise today’s knowledge worker with your physical presence? Such a belief is self-defeating. It may sound O.K in the 1800’s and in modern manufacturing or a construction setting but not in the 21st Century office! You would rather be able to monitor your employee’s performance and adequately reward that through virtual workplaces since you are better placed to track his activities online. He is also free to experiment and become more innovative and creative in his task. This way, you save your worker the stress of you breathing on the back of his neck and allow him to work whenever he can and how. All you do is consult with him and agree on task to be performed and a deadline. Whether he works from the beach or on public transportation at 2.00am or 9.00pm is left to him to decide. And work progress can always be viewed by the supervisor from any location around the globe while giving needed direction as may be warranted. This way, you will save your employee all the hassles we mentioned at the outset of this article.

    Regarding performance, since there are predetermined time parameters set and agreed upon by both you and the employee, his meeting those deadlines plus achieving what is required of him become the basis of his pay, and not because he spent eight (8) hours or more on your premises idling about and adding to cost.

    Strategies to make the workplace more inspiring
    Consulting with your employee can make your workplace more inspiring. The process should comprise when to work and target to reach. This may seem absurd to many a business owner or manager today. He may reason that he hired the employee and knows what he requires of him; hence the employee has no choice but to obey. Yes obedience is good. But are you aware that we have come out of the master-slave relationship era? Although many organisations still operate in that mode, it is now certainly outmoded. In today’s technological age, information is no longer the preserve of top management, the influential, the professor and the rich. Web 2.0 has made available several tools that make easy sharing of information and its access unprecedented in human history. Thus in today’s ‘knowledge worker world’, the relationship between employer and employee should be that of partnership and not master-slave.


    As a sequel to the above, to make the workplace more inspiring, strategy formulation should be participatory, with everyone having an equal say. However, this can only succeed when there is a true ‘citizenship’ culture at the workplace. There are certain employees who are made by their employers to feel that they are citizens of the organization when in reality, they are not part of the decision-making process. Take for example an employee of a large institution who is simply implementing what has been handed down to him by top management. When a customer complains, he tries to shield his employers by saying that he is also part of the organization so s/he is liable to sharing the blame. The reality, though, is that this employee was not part of the boardroom discussions or at least represented during the formulation of such a policy but has been brain-washed into thinking that he is part of the organization, hence his readiness to bear the spleen of the customer. This is what Karl Marx would call ‘false consciousness’. How better it would be if this employee, since he has direct contact with the customer, is included or represented in the decision-making process! Then there would not be an ‘all-knowing’ Board that pretends to ‘know’ customers’ needs better than anyone else and force obnoxious procedures and processes on employees and customers alike.

    Next, avoid being driven purely by materialistic goals. Sure, your business is not a charity. And you are in business to make money. However, if you think your profit is more important to you than your employees, you would simply be putting the symbolic cart before the horse. Your employees would be de-motivated and that profit may never come. Here is a practical example:

    While working as marketing/sales executive for a company after graduating from the university, I went to a meeting with the managing director of a popular supermarket chain for a presentation. After all the hard work of preparation with the support of my boss, I went into this meeting only for my lap-top to refuse to boot! Uncharacteristically, this MD began hurling abuses and curses at me. Calmly, I packed and left, despondent. While on my way back to the office I worried about the disappointment my boss might feel and express. What a relief it was when, after relating the incident to him, all he said was: “Don’t worry; you can’t always get it right. You can win some deals and lose others so just cheer-up!” That was more morale-boosting for me than a heavier pay-cheque. If that boss were obsessed with me meeting my target, he could have ended up discouraging me the more.

    There are so many salespeople out there who do not in the least enjoy their work because they are being treated by management as slaves. The Board sit and decide they have to make so much profit by the end of the year and force this down the throat of the sales manager who in turn forces it down that of the salesperson without taking cognizance of the realities on the ground. If this attitude is not selfish and self-destructive, I do not know what it is! Such a practice must be eschewed in today’s management since it tends to overly stress employees out. And a stressed-out, depressed employee whose job is on the line can never be innovative and creative.

    I sometimes wonder why we have so much IT technology that is meant to make life easier and more fun for us and yet, we have rather become more stressed-out and depressed. This is all due to management practices that belong to the museum; practices that are not in tune with the realities of today simply because some ‘top management’ refuses to be adaptable and innovative. Such orgnisations may be doomed to failure within the next couple of decades, unless they change. And a wise, visionary entrepreneur would steer clear of that road being travelled by the many simply because it seems easier in their eyes. By doing so, he will make his workplace inspiring, fun, humane and even human.

  • What Are You Cooking in the Management Kitchen?

    What Are You Cooking in the Management Kitchen?

    Food is one of the delights of mankind. And gratefully, there is a variety of it. The types of food there are, are endless. And what is more, any creative person can ‘design’ his own type of cuisine.

    Originally, mankind ate fresh foods—fruits, vegetables, nuts and grains; most of which didn’t require cooking. When cooking actually begun is still a debatable issue. But most likely, that could be when man begun eating meat and fish which would generally require cooking.

    There are various forms of cooking—baking, boiling, roasting, smoking, frying, steaming, braising and

    most recently, microwaving and air frying. Invariably, cooking requires the application of heat, although in some cases, that can also be achieved through chemical reactions, as in the case of “Ceviche, a traditional Spanish dish where fish is cooked with the acids in lemon or lime juice”—Wikipedia

    Cooking achieves several purposes including enhancing taste, flavour, preservation and the like. But whatever the method employed, food served should be balanced. A balanced diet is a meal that combines all the needed ingredients in their right proportions. These are carbohydrates, proteins, minerals, vitamins, oil/fat and water. When balanced diet is taken, it gives the body vitality and boosts the immune system, among other benefits. If food is not taken over a long period of time, it can lead to death. Meanwhile, if the right nutrients are missing, even though a person may be eating regularly, he would develop such conditions as kwashiorkor and scurvy. Eating good food, not just food, is thus very crucial to life.

    Business-Kitchen

    We all work to, as the saying goes, put food on the table. But have you ever considered the work you do as food itself? And are you aware that in the business-kitchen, management is the chef? Let’s look at some practical examples:

    In the food chain, what is raw material is actually food for another. For instance, the raw material of fish becomes food to man when processed. Similarly, what your orgnisation produces as its final product, may be either an ingredient or whole food for another organisaton. The same principle applies to the final consumer. So what are you cooking? Do you cook it right?

    As in the case of real food, the absence of certain ‘ingredients’ in your product or service could lead to ‘kwashiorkor’, ‘scurvy’ or even ‘death’ in another business. Each one of us, then, does well to ask how we are doing in the food chain of business.

    Chef-Management

    The chef is typically the chief cook. He is responsible for managing the kitchen and its staff and makes sure that whatever goes out of the kitchen meets the right standards. He also creates the menu and procures inventory. He takes responsibility for whatever emanates from the kitchen; whether positive or negative, good or bad.

    Management as chef of the organisation likewise takes responsibility for the production and distribution of its goods and services. This is a weighty responsibility that should be handled with care. Management, in creating the menu for the organization to prepare and serve its customers thus takes care of planning and organizing, among other things to ensure that what is required is prepared at the right time and to the expected standard.

    In taking care of this responsibility, then, we do well to ask management how effectively it is doing it. If chef-management really pursues excellence, it would be interested in gauging the culinary demands of its customers and make that the centre of its activities. In other words, the company becomes customer-centric. This place that the customer rightfully occupies would dictate to chef-management what menu to create, materials to be procured and the way these materials should be put together to provide a tasty and healthful dish of quality products and services that meet customer expectations.

    In the kitchen, the computing principle of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) applies very much. What do you think would happen if the chef decided to select rotten tomatoes and expired salad cream but in combination with salad leaves in excellent condition, how would the salad taste? It could even poison the eater!

    In like manner, if management decides to work with poorly motivated human resources and choose cheap raw materials or spare-parts for production, but with state-of-the-art machinery, the output would be slipshod. That is why it is necessary for management to apply the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM). In this way, an astute management-chef does not need a competitor to prompt them in doing the right things.

    It is, therefore, necessary for each one of us in management positions to ask ourselves: “Am I employing all the ingredients of quality human and material resources to produce a well-balanced diet of quality products and services? Or in a bid to beat the competition I select the bad ones and mix them with outwardly impressive edifices and equipment?” the latter scenario would be beneficial in the short-term but not in the long-term!

    Management of Cooks

    The chef manages the kitchen staff, principal among who are the cooks. The cooks are there to support the chef in achieving his aim (on a lighter note, I wonder why all the chefs I’ve come across are men). If the chef does not motivate the cooks under him, he stands the danger of losing his job or business. This is because a cook may inadvertently do the wrong thing due to down-heartedness and that can cost the chef dearly. In extreme cases, though, the cooks may deliberately sabotage the chef and ruin his reputation!

    I heard the story in the early-to-mid 2000’s of the assistant at a popular rice and beans (waakye) joint in Accra, Ghana who deliberately poisoned the food of her mistress for whatever reasons. That sent many customers to hospital.

    So chef-management, how do you treat your employees? Do you view them as non-entities whose responsibility is to just do what they are told, get paid a pauper’s wage and leave? Well, in that case, your employees would be working perfunctorily and sometimes absent mindedly. And if that continues, you may end up losing your customers because quality is not being served. And as in the case of the ‘waakye’ joint episode, some of your employees, albeit wrong, would be so disgruntled that they would deliberately do things to jeopardize your organization or business.

    On the other hand, if you treat them well and give them a stake in the organization or your business, they would do all they can in their power to elevate the image of your organization. Once again, no amount of competition would help you to reach that height!

    In Ghanaian cuisine, one ingredient that is cherished by a lot is stinking fish (mormorni). It stinks alright, but when added to such dishes as palava sauce, okro stew or garden egg stew, many can’t help but continue devouring the food without even realizing that they’re full!

    In your organization, is there a mormorni-emplyee? The first reaction may be to get rid of him; throw him out to the garbage dump. But you might actually be throwing out what you really need to enhance the taste and flavor of your services or products!

    The natural smell of mormorni is repugnant, granted. But we appreciate its use. Similarly, in your employee selection process, or even after full-employment, you may come to realize that a particular employee seems to be a non-conformist—almost always wrestling management. That could amount to pungent smell for management. But is that person necessarily bad? Does he desire to see the company slump? Or could it be that, blended well, this person may be the one to give the organization that new direction or luster and progressiveness through his constructive criticisms and willingness to challenge the status quo?

    Yes, seek to make good use of your mormorni-employee; he might just be the one to help you win the loyalty of your customer!

    Employee-Cook

    As an employee, you are the cook in the organization or business, helping the kitchen to serve sumptuous, healthful meals of quality products and services to the customers of the organization. A cook who is not engaged in the company’s activities would become a weak link in the food chain of production. If that should happen, you can’t earn the trust of your employer, let alone be accorded honour with bigger and more dignifying roles or responsibilities.

    As an employee-cook, then, you need to understand the menu of product/service mix of the organization. It doesn’t matter whether you are in marketing or accounting. You must educate yourself adequately on the company’s products and services vis-à-vis its mission and vision. This would arm you with the right perspective to discern creative and innovative ways to contribute towards the achievement of success for the organization.

    In the kitchen, a cook who doesn’t appreciate quality customer service would take things for granted and use ingredients that are either inappropriate or rotten. In like manner, if you as an employee, whether in production or reception don’t appreciate the essence of customer service and how to deliver it effectively, you would become ‘sand’ in the ‘gari’ prepared by chef-management.

    When your employer’s customers are dissatisfied, they will leave. While you might find another job elsewhere if the business collapses as a result, you have just deprived a sibling or a relative of yours of finding a job with a highly successful organization!

    Hence, as an employee, you do well to ask yourself if you are really a good cook in the kitchen of your employer or a bad one. If you are of the latter category, do an honest introspective analysis of yourself and find areas in which you need improvements. Even if you are of the former category, there’s always more room for improvement.

    Some ways you can contribute to the quality of the meals of products and services served by your organization is to be creative and innovative.

    In the kitchen, a creative cook can think of the creation of a dish that could become the hallmark of the restaurant’s reputation. In the same vein, by studying your organization and understanding the functions of each department, you could come up with ways in which the resources of the departments could be better harnessed to develop a new product or service that could become the milk-cow of the organization.

    Cook Right!

    Whether chef-management or cook-employee, we all have very critical roles to play in the outworking of things in the organization. How we perform our respective roles and the mutual respect and dignity accorded each other, would go a long way in developing an excellent menu of product/service mix and nutritious meals of high quality products and services for our customers.

    If you haven’t yet taken breakfast or lunch, I hope I whetted your appetite for it. All the same, what are you cooking, poison or food?

    NubianJobs

  • Revolutionizing HR in Africa: Addressing the Root Causes of Talent Gaps and Unemployment

    In recent years, employers have been complaining about the quality of human resource/capital in Africa. I vividly recall some notable business leaders adding their voice to the chorus. Personally, I have also had a brush with this challenge, and it continues getting worse by the day.

    What really is the problem; is it with employees or rather, is that just the symptom of the real problem? What should HR managers be doing to hire the right caliber of human resources and what should both job seekers and employees be doing to improve their own fortunes and those of their employers?

    The Symptom

    I see the unfortunate quality of HR as, not the problem per se, but the symptom of the real problems. The real culprits are 1) the antiquated educational curriculum and 2) pathological HRM practices. Let us look at these factors individually.

    Our educational system has not seen much improvement since independence. Meanwhile, the curriculum implemented by the colonial administrations was based on tenets of the industrial revolution in the Western world. And it was basically meant to produce clerical staff who would not be decision-makers, but implementers of decision handed down to them from the top. Unfortunately, decades on, very little has changed, if any, and I do not see any change in sight soon.

    In school, students are taught the philosophies of scholars of generations past when those scholars did not know about electricity, let alone the Internet. While some of those philosophies are still relevant, is it not time to purge our textbooks of those that have out-lived their usefulness and start teaching more practical stuff?

    Some business school students for instance are told by some of their lecturers that they should not deceive themselves into thinking that what they learn in class is what is practiced in the real world. But can we entirely blame these lecturers? Certainly not when they are only handing down what the obsolete system and textbooks have fed them. Is it any wonder, then, that the classroom is so uninspiring and boring to today’s student? Hence, when a graduate comes out of school to realize that practice is really diametrically different from the books just as his lecturers told him, he cannot help but be bewildered. In that state, it becomes a real nightmare for him to meet the expectations of his employer.

    Employer says: “I hired this man because he has a certificate in this discipline. Yet he turns out to be a dumb!” Employee says: “I expect my employer to provide training for me, but he is too stingy to sponsor it!” Why the education, then? Was it useful in the first place? Hardly!

    So, what is the way forward? I see the solution in discarding equally obsolete HR practices in our organisations. Since the textbook is not in tune with present requirements, it is high time we started questioning the recruitment process that has been handed down to us over the years.

    The world has moved on, very much. Yet our recruitment processes have remained largely stagnant. Most HR managers are still obsessed with what one studied in school and his grade to determine the applicant’s suitability or otherwise when the educational system does not even meet the requirements of today’s enterprise, to begin with. Hence, HR should begin looking for certain human capabilities as determining factors in hiring employees instead of the penchant for certificates, looks, eloquence and the like. While those variables may still be important in certain circumstances, they are no longer the most important elements in today’s world. Following are some of the qualities I propose HR should be looking out for:

    The Remedies

    The first is to determine the creative and innovative aptitude of the applicant. In the creative economy of today, employing one with a fine certificate is not enough. It is impossible for any organisation to be creative and innovative if its employees are bereft of such qualities. And in the absence of those traits, no business will be able to satisfy the sophisticated demands of one of its very key publics, the customer. Yet, without the customer, there is no business. Hence HR should be able to gauge how creative and how innovative the applicant is. Unless such qualities are present in the applicant, he will only add to the liabilities of the organization, irrespective of how high he scored in exams and in the interview process.

    I get perturbed when I see articles or hear of seminars that coach how to write a winning cover letter and CV and how to perform well at the interview. Granted, there are certain impressions that we form of people the first time we encounter them; whether through writing, interview or otherwise. That is innate. The problem, though, is that we are not always right. But since HR has been obsessed with those stereotypes, ‘experts’ have to teach them. But is that helpful?

    There are a good number of people who hardly fail interviews and yet when it comes to performance, they are simply sloppy! There are those who have all the good looks, eloquence, interpersonal relations skill, good certificates and the like but add very little value in terms of creativity and innovativeness to the organisation upon being hired. The reason why is that just as the marketer studies the market to find out what customers need and provide it, so these applicants also equip themselves with knowledge about how to get that ‘hot’ job. Unlike marketers, though, landing the job is the end; not the means. And they succeed. Add to the agony, many of those likeable personalities and great academic achievers generally constitute the most part of the 80% of the workforce that is distracted; with high energy but low output/productivity, since they know they can either always switch jobs at will or maneuver their job security.

    Second, HR should begin looking for the entrepreneurial spirit in applicants. In the present world order, the way business runs is very different. However, the educational system is structured to churn out clerical labour-force to couple the antiquated top-down model of administration. This misleads HR to look for employees that will be implementing decisions, instead of creating by being part of the decision-making process.

    This kind of administration worked perfectly for employers during the industrial revolution when management used to be the repository of wisdom. However, today, any organization that continues to run in that mode can expect to fold-up in the next few decades. HR should therefore be looking for employees who have the ability to start their own business. Such ones are eager to learn new things and are more likely to be highly productive since they work creatively. And, if given enough autonomy, they would perform amazingly well. In other words, organisations that encourage employees to start “intrapreneurs” would perform better.

    Third, HR should take a re-look at its job appraisal systems. Currently, the most popular methods that are being employed in big organizations as performance appraisal processes are: Management by objectives (MBO), 360 degree appraisal, Behavioral Observation Scale (BOS) and Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). None of this gives attention to the critical human capabilities that drive success in the creative economy. For instance, they do not measure the entrepreneurial capabilities of the employee which are essential for developing new products or enhancing existing ones or developing new markets. In other words, the performance of employees should, among others, be measured in terms of the value they add to the organisation’s business and adequately reward such.

    Fourth, HR must revise its reward systems. Rewards must not be automatic; tied to one’s qualification. They have should be linked with value-addition. I expect that when HR hires someone whom the company pays an X amount a month, that employee should be able to add value worth YYYY or more. Otherwise, what business sense would it make? When such reward systems are put in place, employees would eschew sloth and loafing and put in their best for the organisation and themselves.

    Fifth, HR should be wary of applicants who work for money and not for a higher course of bettering the lot of the organisation’s publics. An employee who is not customer-oriented, for instance, is absolutely a ‘no-hire’ person. This is because, irrespective of one’s duty/assignment, respect for the customer and a sense of social responsibility would reflect on how he works. But if the emphasis is on money, that would lead to disastrous consequences as we see around us.

    Sixth, redefine working hours. The notion that productivity is linked with the number of hours at work is a fallacy. Maybe, that would pass for factory work and the like that require less use of the brain and more physical activity. However, the case is different when it comes to the present knowledge/information economic dispensation.

    Let us face the fact: how many of us can continuously sit behind their computer and work for eight hours daily? You would burn-out and make unpardonable mistakes. The truth is we are most active for brain work in the morning hours; 3-4 hours a day max. The rest of the time, we are receiving visitors, replying to emails, discussing politics and the economy and the like. Thus it would be more prudent if HR would reduce working hours to the most productive hours of, say, 8am to 2pm, and save cost for the company while increasing productivity and consign the 9-5 working hours to the museum.

    Seventh, HR should learn from the law of diminishing returns. The law states “that we will get less and less extra output when we add additional doses of an input while holding other inputs fixed. In other words, the marginal product of each unit of input will decline as the amount of that input increases holding all other inputs constant”–Samuelson & Nordhaus.

    This law applies with equal force to our over-staffed organisations. It is therefore high time HR began to evaluate the productivity of each employee and seek to fine-tune the relationship between the amount of human capital and output.

    For the above to succeed, the relationship between the IT department and HR must also be fine-tuned. IT technology is supposed to help human capital achieve more within less time. However, we hardly appreciate the extent to which the IT department must be integrated with HR. The result is that, instead of achieving more with less, we are achieving less with more! This situation must change. And once productivity is improved, more jobs would be created as a result of growth.

    Eighth, it is wise for HR to hire people with a wider range of knowledge. For instance, could you imagine how much time would be saved if every employee could at least troubleshoot and fix a malfunction on their computer instead of waiting on the ubiquitous IT officer to do that for them? The accountant, also, is supposed to provide financial information to management. But how much better it would be if he understood marketing enough to advise on what new product should be developed to appreciate cash-flow, for instance. Thus, HR must audit and eliminate the disconnect between departments to encourage productivity in order to trigger off a multiplier effect on wealth creation.

    Ninth, the workplace should be made homely. If HR insists on maintaining the 9-5 fixation, then what about making the workplace more homely? For instance, would it not add to productivity if there are rooms with a few camp-beds to enable tired workers to take a nap? If siesta was good for us when we were in school what makes it evil when we are adults and working? I believe you appreciate the calming and refreshing effect of just 5-minutes of deep sleep in the afternoon. Even though there is the possibility of abuse, this can be curtailed very easily. Yet the benefits would be invaluable. On the side, there is this growing canker of sexual harassment that is seriously tarnishing the image of HRM and if this is not checked, the time would come when HRM would be synonymous with sexual harassment. One of my very good friends posted the following on her face-book wall some time ago: “People, what is the meaning of this? You go through 4 years of books, exams and sometimes no sleep just to come out to land a decent job but the second your application gets to some CEO or MD he sees it as an invitation to trespass your private property. Your mistake is that you don’t want to be unemployed!” And here is someone’s response to that: “My dear that is why some of us are hiding in our own small ghetto…” Pathetic indeed! I would challenge every company that is worth its reputation to provide a channel, maybe a desk, to handle such complaints for those villains to be dealt with adequately. Otherwise, apart from further destroying the moral fibre of society, the wrong persons would always be hired to do slip-shod jobs just because they are ready to trade sex for jobs.

    Turning attention to prospective job seekers and employees

    The fact is that what you need to be a successful worker is not taught in class. So, take your days in school as an opportunity to train your analytical skills by reading widely. Whereas most of the things we learn in school are not practicable, they can be intellectually stimulating. Thus it pays to develop a broad mind and be able to analyse situations as they emerge to solve problems. Also, it is wise to take advantage of good training workshops/seminars where you will learn practical on-the-job skills that will add to your employability and competence on the job to assure job security. The following are some more of the qualities to develop:

    Desist from following the colonial-old mentality of finishing school to work with some large organisation, a bank and the like, earning good cash and living large. I would not encourage you to go into entrepreneurship if you are not inclined to, though it is the best. Yet, look for employment with the purpose of learning and adding value to yourself and your job. This would eventually rob-off on the larger society since more jobs would be created.

    Avoid the trap of choosing the size of a pay-cheque over the opportunity of a learning experience that is presented to you. Looking for a job with the sole intent of making money is seriously flawed and robs many of job satisfaction and blinds them to golden opportunities staring at their faces. Admittedly, you spent valuable resources on your education, and you would rationally want to reap the rewards. However, you would never be satisfied with money if making money were your main goal. This is because the more you earn, the more you would spend to reflect your financial and social status.

    Let us look at one scenario here:

    You receive a job offer from company ‘A’ for a salary and benefits three times what company ‘B’ offers. Meanwhile, company ‘B’ offers a working environment where you are allowed much autonomy and the possibility of unearthing your potential to reach your peak while company ‘A’ only offers you a repetitive, discrete and routine work schedule that is hardly challenging. Which one would you choose? Please answer for yourself.

    Mind you, though, that just as there is a waiting period between planting and fruiting; and, depending on the type of crop fruition can take between 3 months and 7 or more years, cultivate that patience even in the face of the seeming early fruition for some of your colleagues. Always remember though that there is someone whose fruition time is longer than yours. By being such a valuable employee to your employer, you would learn valuable lessons and reap greater rewards later.

    Further, take time to learn all you can about, not just your job, but the whole organisation to which you belong. Seek to understand the mission and vision statements of your organisation and continually seek to fine-tune your efforts towards contributing to the achievement of those. It would amaze you just how much you would be inspired to be creative and innovative, thus adding value to your employer’s business and securing your job and your future.

    If you are still looking for a job, identify the organiastion you would like to work for and determine what you can do to enhance its business. If that does not still land you a job, can you ‘create’ a department for that organisation and head it? That may as well be a business opportunity for you. And you might end up earning several folds more than you would have if you were employed! Eventually, you would also be employing others. And given your experience, you would be able to hire very good employees, maybe even better than yourself.

    I see the unemployment situation in the economy of the world and in Africa in particular partly as a result of failed HR management. If HR were effective in hiring the right people to meet changing times and employees were self-motivated to give of themselves, productivity would be higher. And when productivity is higher, business would expand and when business expands, jobs would be created to absorb the glut on the job market.

    All that we have been addressing is not taught in the classroom, they are not in textbooks. They are qualities that the prospective employee should develop along the way. Yet if HR itself is not in that mode, then the problems will persist.

    I would be most grateful for your thoughts; whether you agree or disagree with any of my views or you have some contribution.

  • Hello working Africa!

    Welcome to our Publications. Here, we discuss how both HR and Employees alike should understand their respective complimentary role in light of modern technology and social changes. Have fun! 😍

    Untitled